Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The morality and ethics of hunting : towards common ground

Thesis (MPhil (Philosophy))--University of Stellenbosch, 1999.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Patterson, Claire
Other Authors: Hattingh, J. P.
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch 2009
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613892988895232
access_status_str Open Access
author Patterson, Claire
author2 Hattingh, J. P.
author_browse Hattingh, J. P.
Patterson, Claire
author_facet Hattingh, J. P.
Patterson, Claire
author_sort Patterson, Claire
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv University of Stellenbosch
description Thesis (MPhil (Philosophy))--University of Stellenbosch, 1999.
format Thesis
id oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/1798
institution Stellenbosch University (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:43:21.794Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
publishDate 2009
publishDateRange 2009
publishDateSort 2009
publisher Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch
publisherStr Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch
record_format dspace
source_str SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
spelling oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/1798 The morality and ethics of hunting : towards common ground Patterson, Claire Hattingh, J. P. University of Stellenbosch. Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences. Dept. of Philosophy. Dissertations -- Philosophy Theses -- Philosophy Dissertations -- Applied ethics Theses -- Applied ethics Hunting -- Moral en ethical aspects Thesis (MPhil (Philosophy))--University of Stellenbosch, 1999. The hunters and anti-hunting have been arguing for years over whether or not trophy hunting should be allowed. While attempts have been made to resolve the issue, no widely acceptable solution has yet been found. Hunters have put forward various arguments including: religion, instinct, sustainable utilization, money, excessive populations and the wildlife management support argument. These have usually been criticized for being management orientate and not addressing the focal question of the anti-hunters: 'What gives man the right to hunt'. Anti-hunters have countered these arguments and presented new ones. These include: cruelty, animal rights, animal liberation, special and rare species as well as religion and wildlife management support arguments. The anti-hunters have used sympathy and emotion to gain support for their movement while making effective use of the media. Hunters on the other hand have been slow to make use of this communication tool. In presenting their arguments, a fundamental difference has been identified between the use of the various terms. The seemingly simple word 'ethics' has been used by the hunters to mean a code of conduct while the anti-hunters have used this word in indicate the morality of man's actions. The inherent value of an animal has also been debated. Does an animal have value in and of itself or does it only have value in that it is useful to man? Furthermore, is it the individual animal, the species or the population which has value? The value of wildlife as a natural resource and the right to use this resource is also discussed. Do developed countries have the right to determine the use that a developing country may make of its resources? Leopold's land ethics is discussed an it is shown how hunting preserves the integrity, stability and beauty of the biotic community. In order to address the issues raised by the debate, it is necessary for the hunters and the anti-hunters to be willing to work towards common goals. It is unlikely that either side would ever be willing to give up their position but if they can agree to work towards some common goals, the long on-going debate would have achieved something. For this reason, four solution to this debate are looked at and analyzed. Their weakness and failures are discussed as well as their strong points. Taylor's Priority Principles are then analyzed to identify the first steps that need to be taken in draWing up guidelines for hunting. While this assignment does not attempt to identify these guidelines it does point out the need to have such guidelines and establishes that there can be common ground. Also, that it is desirable to achieve this aim. The assignment highlights the need for groups to work towards common goals without having to give up their beliefs and standpoints. There will be time later to determine whether or not man should hunt. In the meantime, man should be focussing on hunting ethically - both in the moral sense and within the framework of a good code of conduct. Masters 2009-11-03T07:39:59Z 2010-06-01T08:33:33Z 2009-11-03T07:39:59Z 2010-06-01T08:33:33Z 1999-12 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/1798 en University of Stellenbosch application/pdf Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch
spellingShingle Dissertations -- Philosophy
Theses -- Philosophy
Dissertations -- Applied ethics
Theses -- Applied ethics
Hunting -- Moral en ethical aspects
Patterson, Claire
The morality and ethics of hunting : towards common ground
title The morality and ethics of hunting : towards common ground
title_full The morality and ethics of hunting : towards common ground
title_fullStr The morality and ethics of hunting : towards common ground
title_full_unstemmed The morality and ethics of hunting : towards common ground
title_short The morality and ethics of hunting : towards common ground
title_sort morality and ethics of hunting towards common ground
topic Dissertations -- Philosophy
Theses -- Philosophy
Dissertations -- Applied ethics
Theses -- Applied ethics
Hunting -- Moral en ethical aspects
url http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/1798
work_keys_str_mv AT pattersonclaire themoralityandethicsofhuntingtowardscommonground
AT pattersonclaire moralityandethicsofhuntingtowardscommonground