Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Tenuitvoerlegging van hofbevele teen die Staat

Thesis (LLM (Public Law))--University of Stellenbosch, 2006.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wessels, Louis
Other Authors: De Vos, W. L.
Format: Thesis
Language:Afrikaans
Published: Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch 2008
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613741495877632
access_status_str Open Access
author Wessels, Louis
author2 De Vos, W. L.
author_browse De Vos, W. L.
Wessels, Louis
author_facet De Vos, W. L.
Wessels, Louis
author_sort Wessels, Louis
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv University of Stellenbosch
description Thesis (LLM (Public Law))--University of Stellenbosch, 2006.
format Thesis
id oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/1849
institution Stellenbosch University (South Africa)
language Afrikaans
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:40:58.109Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
publishDate 2008
publishDateRange 2008
publishDateSort 2008
publisher Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch
publisherStr Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch
record_format dspace
source_str SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
spelling oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/1849 Tenuitvoerlegging van hofbevele teen die Staat Wessels, Louis De Vos, W. L. University of Stellenbosch. Faculty of Law. Dept. of Public Law. Government liability -- South Africa Executions (Law) -- South Africa Contumacy -- South Africa Dissertations -- Law Theses -- Law Dissertations -- Public law Theses -- Public law Thesis (LLM (Public Law))--University of Stellenbosch, 2006. A worrying recent trend is the failure of national government and some provincial governments to comply with court orders. The prohibition on execution of court orders against the state (as contained in section 3 of the State Liabilities Act) has left judgement creditors in these cases without an effective remedy for execution. In contrast, in the absence of a provision prohibiting execution of judgement debt against local governments, creditors of such governments are able to attach all the assets of local governments in execution of such debt. This has resulted in these local governments being unable to fulfil their constitutional obligation to provide basic services. This study investigates the South African rules in respect of the execution of court orders against the state with the aim of proposing a solution for the above problems. First of all, the historical and ideological origins of section 3 are set out. Thereafter, the courts’ practical interpretation of section 3 is investigated. From the above inquiry it becomes apparent that, at present, section 3 prohibits all steps towards execution of judgement debt against both the national government and provincial governments. As against this, local governments are not protected by section 3 and as such, court orders (except in certain exceptional instances) may freely be executed against local governments. The constitutionality of this state of affairs is considered next. It is argued that section 3 is incompatible with the doctrines of the rule of law, the supremacy of the Constitution and the separation of powers. It is also submitted that section 3 is an unjustifiable limitation of sections 9 and 34 of the Constitution, in addition to being contrary to sections 165, 173 and 195(f) of the Constitution. In order to achieve a constitutionally acceptable approach to execution of court orders against the state, and as a consequence of the above findings, it is recommended that section 3 should be amended to (a) make it clear that the state is obliged to comply with court orders, (b) to ensure that creditors have effective means of executing judgement debt against the state and (c) to ensure that the government is not rendered impotent by such execution procedures. Thereafter, international approaches to execution of court orders against the state are investigated. These approaches are then measured against the above-mentioned guidelines for achieving a constitutionally acceptable dispensation for execution of court orders so as to evaluate the suitability of such remedies for South African law. In the light of this discussion, it is proposed that effective remedies for execution of judgement debt against the state should be made available. It is proposed that: (a) orders ad factum praestandum should be enforceable by contempt of court proceedings, (b) orders ad pecuniam solvendam should be enforceable by means of attachment of state assets for purposes of execution (suggestions are also made to counter the disruptive effect of this remedy) and (c) that courts should also be able to issue declaratory orders that an order of court has been disobeyed by the state. 2008-08-07T12:14:53Z 2010-06-01T08:34:46Z 2008-08-07T12:14:53Z 2010-06-01T08:34:46Z 2006-03 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/1849 Afrikaans University of Stellenbosch application/pdf Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch
spellingShingle Government liability -- South Africa
Executions (Law) -- South Africa
Contumacy -- South Africa
Dissertations -- Law
Theses -- Law
Dissertations -- Public law
Theses -- Public law
Wessels, Louis
Tenuitvoerlegging van hofbevele teen die Staat
title Tenuitvoerlegging van hofbevele teen die Staat
title_full Tenuitvoerlegging van hofbevele teen die Staat
title_fullStr Tenuitvoerlegging van hofbevele teen die Staat
title_full_unstemmed Tenuitvoerlegging van hofbevele teen die Staat
title_short Tenuitvoerlegging van hofbevele teen die Staat
title_sort tenuitvoerlegging van hofbevele teen die staat
topic Government liability -- South Africa
Executions (Law) -- South Africa
Contumacy -- South Africa
Dissertations -- Law
Theses -- Law
Dissertations -- Public law
Theses -- Public law
url http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/1849
work_keys_str_mv AT wesselslouis tenuitvoerleggingvanhofbeveleteendiestaat