Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Is natural good for you? Myths, perceptions and science in advertising, marketing and the media

Thesis (MPhil)--Stellenbosch University, 2008.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Frost, Jennifer
Other Authors: Claassen, George
Format: Thesis
Language:en_ZA
Published: Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University 2012
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613882763182080
access_status_str Open Access
author Frost, Jennifer
author2 Claassen, George
author_browse Claassen, George
Frost, Jennifer
author_facet Claassen, George
Frost, Jennifer
author_sort Frost, Jennifer
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv Stellenbosch University
description Thesis (MPhil)--Stellenbosch University, 2008.
format Thesis
id oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/21623
institution Stellenbosch University (South Africa)
language en_ZA
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:43:12.690Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
publishDate 2012
publishDateRange 2012
publishDateSort 2012
publisher Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
publisherStr Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
record_format dspace
source_str SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
spelling oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/21623 Is natural good for you? Myths, perceptions and science in advertising, marketing and the media Frost, Jennifer Claassen, George Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences. Dept. of Journalism. Advertising -- Natural foods Nutrition in mass media -- South Africa Natural foods industry -- Press coverage -- South Africa Mass media and public opinion -- South Africa Mass media and publicity Theses -- Journalism Dissertations -- Journalism Thesis (MPhil)--Stellenbosch University, 2008. ENGLISH ABSTRACT: This assignment explores the assumptions and perceptions – both real, and created by the media, marketers and advertisers – surrounding the word “natural” when applied to health foods, vitamins, home remedies and medication. It also examines the anti-science stance taken by many promoters of such products and the appeal that stance holds for targeted consumers. In it an attempt is made to answer the following questions: What is the source of this apparently “antiscience” point of view? How have the media contributed to this type of sentiment? Why do socalled “natural” products hold more appeal to consumers than their synthetic equivalents? Is there a difference between such products? Is the difference real or perceived? Or, is it merely a media construct? Does the popularity of these ideas indicate a growing distrust of science and governments? What effect has the media’s portrayal of science had on peoples’ attitudes to it? And, above all, what have the media done to advance the idea that “natural” is good for you? AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie werkstuk ondersoek die veronderstellings en persepsies – die werklike sowel as dié wat deur die media, bemarkers en adverteerders geskep word – met betrekking tot die woord “natuurlik” wanneer dit toegepas word op gesondheidsvoedsel, vitamiene, boererate en medikasie. Dit bekyk ook die antiwetenskaplike houding wat baie voorstanders van sodanige produkte inneem en die trefkrag wat dié houding op die teikenmark uitoefen. In dié studie is ’n poging aangewend om die volgende vrae te beantwoord: Wat is die oorsprong van hierdie klaarblyklik “antiwetenskaplike” oogpunt? Hoe het die media bygedra tot dié idee? Hoekom is die sogenaamd “natuurlike” produkte soveel aantrekliker vir die gebruiker as hulle sintetiese ekwivalente? Is daar ’n verskil tussen sodanige produkte? Is daar ’n werklike verskil of is dit slegs ‘n persepsie? Of is dit bloot ’n maaksel van die media? Dui die gewildheid van hierdie idees op ’n toenemende gebrek aan vertroue in die wetenskap en die owerhede? Watter uitwerking het die media se voorstelling van die wetenskap op mense se houding ten opsigte daarvan? En, veral, wat het die media gedoen ter bevordering van die idee dat “natuurlik” goed is vir jou? Masters 2012-07-06T07:39:37Z 2012-07-06T07:39:37Z 2008-03 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/21623 en_ZA Stellenbosch University 76 leaves : ill. application/pdf Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
spellingShingle Advertising -- Natural foods
Nutrition in mass media -- South Africa
Natural foods industry -- Press coverage -- South Africa
Mass media and public opinion -- South Africa
Mass media and publicity
Theses -- Journalism
Dissertations -- Journalism
Frost, Jennifer
Is natural good for you? Myths, perceptions and science in advertising, marketing and the media
title Is natural good for you? Myths, perceptions and science in advertising, marketing and the media
title_full Is natural good for you? Myths, perceptions and science in advertising, marketing and the media
title_fullStr Is natural good for you? Myths, perceptions and science in advertising, marketing and the media
title_full_unstemmed Is natural good for you? Myths, perceptions and science in advertising, marketing and the media
title_short Is natural good for you? Myths, perceptions and science in advertising, marketing and the media
title_sort is natural good for you myths perceptions and science in advertising marketing and the media
topic Advertising -- Natural foods
Nutrition in mass media -- South Africa
Natural foods industry -- Press coverage -- South Africa
Mass media and public opinion -- South Africa
Mass media and publicity
Theses -- Journalism
Dissertations -- Journalism
url http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/21623
work_keys_str_mv AT frostjennifer isnaturalgoodforyoumythsperceptionsandscienceinadvertisingmarketingandthemedia