Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Source and identity of insect contaminants in export consignments of table grapes

Thesis (MScAgric (Conservation Ecology and Entomology)--University of Stellenbosch, 2005.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pryke, James Stephen
Other Authors: Samways, Michael J.
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch 2008
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867614106510426112
access_status_str Open Access
author Pryke, James Stephen
author2 Samways, Michael J.
author_browse Pryke, James Stephen
Samways, Michael J.
author_facet Samways, Michael J.
Pryke, James Stephen
author_sort Pryke, James Stephen
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv University of Stellenbosch
description Thesis (MScAgric (Conservation Ecology and Entomology)--University of Stellenbosch, 2005.
format Thesis
id oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/2276
institution Stellenbosch University (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:46:45.739Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
publishDate 2008
publishDateRange 2008
publishDateSort 2008
publisher Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch
publisherStr Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch
record_format dspace
source_str SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
spelling oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/2276 Source and identity of insect contaminants in export consignments of table grapes Pryke, James Stephen Samways, Michael J. Pringle, K. L. University of Stellenbosch. Faculty of Agrisciences. Dept. of Conservation Ecology and Entomology. Dissertations -- Conservation ecology and entomology Theses -- Conservation ecology and entomology Table grapes -- Diseases and pests -- Control Table grapes -- South Africa -- Hex River Valley Table grapes -- Postharvest diseases and injuries Insect pests -- Control -- South Africa -- Hex River Valley Thesis (MScAgric (Conservation Ecology and Entomology)--University of Stellenbosch, 2005. The South African table grape industry exports approximately 60% of the table grapes produced. A major threat to the export of these grapes is the phytosanitary risk that insect pests pose. This study was conducted in the Hex River Valley, South Africa’s main table grape producing area. The aim of this study was to reduce the number of phytosanitary rejections from insects on table grapes from the Hex River Valley. Thus the main objectives of the study were to identify the most important phytosanitary pests in the Hex River Valley; the determination of their presence in the vineyards with possible means to control them; and to assess the possibility of using postharvest quarantine treatments in the Western Cape. Further aims were to determine the effect of different colour harvesting crates on the phytosanitary pests and whether the phytosanitary pests infested the grapes via packhouses. The most important phytosanitary pests of table grapes of the Hex River Valley are in order of importance: Phlyctinus callosus (Schonherr) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), Epichoristodes acerbella Walker (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), Planococcus ficus (Signoret) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae), Gonocephalum simplex Fabricius (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and Dysdercus fasciatus Signoret (Hemiptera: Pyrrhocoridae). 12.71% of rejections were from species that were not identified, while a further 33% of the rejections were possibly identified incorrectly. Phytosanitary control of P. callosus appeared to be far more effective using Plantex® than pesticides. Weather conditions appeared to affect the abundance of P. callosus, especially warm weather, while bunches harboured less P. callosus later in the day. Control of E. acerbella with DiPel® (Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki) appeared to at least reduce the population within the vineyards, and so its use is recommended. P. ficus is a non-actionable species for the USA market and is not listed as a phytosanitary pest for the Israeli market and so should not be causing any phytosanitary rejections. C. capitata appeared to be successfully controlled by the fruit fly sterile release program and the cold sterilisation it currently undergoes. G. simplex caused few rejections. It is still unclear where this pest infests the grapes, as it was found in both the field and in the packhouses. D. fasciatus occurrence on grapes was probably accidental. It was shown that picking during the early and late parts of the day, when this species was less active, reduced its occurrence in bunches. Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae), although not reported as a reason for rejections in table grapes for the past two years, was an actionable species that was present in large numbers in the Hex River Valley. There was a strong correlation between increasing quantities of pesticides and higher abundances of G. bimaculatus. It appeared to be an indicator of the overuse of pesticides. Results of this study showed that infestation by the phytosanitary pests came from neighbouring vineyards. The creation of barriers to prevent the movement of these pests between vineyards is suggested. Methyl bromide is the most commonly used postharvest quarantine treatment. Owing to the ozone-depleting properties of methyl bromide, it is scheduled to be outlawed in many countries from 2005. Alternative postharvest treatments are irradiation, extreme temperatures, forced air, vapour-heat treatments and the use of controlled atmospheres. Irradiation treatments appeared to control the pests at doses that do not damage the grapes. Controlled atmosphere treatments also have a high probability of success, although more research is required on this treatment. Low temperature treatments are relatively cheap as most exported fruit already undergoes cold storage, and appears to control species in the families Pseudococcidae and Tephritidae, although further research is required for the other pest. Colour or location of the harvesting crates in the vineyards appeared not to influence the number of phytosanitary pests collected, as they were not attracted to these crates. Masters 2008-07-24T11:58:48Z 2010-06-01T08:44:54Z 2008-07-24T11:58:48Z 2010-06-01T08:44:54Z 2005-03 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/2276 en University of Stellenbosch application/pdf Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch
spellingShingle Dissertations -- Conservation ecology and entomology
Theses -- Conservation ecology and entomology
Table grapes -- Diseases and pests -- Control
Table grapes -- South Africa -- Hex River Valley
Table grapes -- Postharvest diseases and injuries
Insect pests -- Control -- South Africa -- Hex River Valley
Pryke, James Stephen
Source and identity of insect contaminants in export consignments of table grapes
title Source and identity of insect contaminants in export consignments of table grapes
title_full Source and identity of insect contaminants in export consignments of table grapes
title_fullStr Source and identity of insect contaminants in export consignments of table grapes
title_full_unstemmed Source and identity of insect contaminants in export consignments of table grapes
title_short Source and identity of insect contaminants in export consignments of table grapes
title_sort source and identity of insect contaminants in export consignments of table grapes
topic Dissertations -- Conservation ecology and entomology
Theses -- Conservation ecology and entomology
Table grapes -- Diseases and pests -- Control
Table grapes -- South Africa -- Hex River Valley
Table grapes -- Postharvest diseases and injuries
Insect pests -- Control -- South Africa -- Hex River Valley
url http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/2276
work_keys_str_mv AT prykejamesstephen sourceandidentityofinsectcontaminantsinexportconsignmentsoftablegrapes