Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

A clarification of the use of multiple regression analysis in meeting the burden of proof in compensation discrimination litigation

Thesis (MComm)--University of Stellenbosch, 2005.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Howard, Ryan Michael
Other Authors: Nel, P.
Format: Thesis
Language:en_ZA
Published: Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University 2012
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867614128892280832
access_status_str Open Access
author Howard, Ryan Michael
author2 Nel, P.
author_browse Howard, Ryan Michael
Nel, P.
author_facet Nel, P.
Howard, Ryan Michael
author_sort Howard, Ryan Michael
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv Stellenbosch University
description Thesis (MComm)--University of Stellenbosch, 2005.
format Thesis
id oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/50238
institution Stellenbosch University (South Africa)
language en_ZA
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:47:07.138Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
publishDate 2012
publishDateRange 2012
publishDateSort 2012
publisher Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
publisherStr Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
record_format dspace
source_str SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
spelling oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/50238 A clarification of the use of multiple regression analysis in meeting the burden of proof in compensation discrimination litigation Howard, Ryan Michael Nel, P. Theron, C. C. Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences. Dept. of Industrial Psychology. Pay equity -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Equal pay for equal work -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Discrimination in employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Burden of proof -- South Africa Wages -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Regression analysis Dissertations -- Industrial psychology Theses -- Industrial psychology Thesis (MComm)--University of Stellenbosch, 2005. ENGLISH ABSTRACT: The new set of employment equity laws call for South African organisations to justify their compensations systems. During compensation discrimination litigation, evidence is required to support arguments put before the court in order to meet the burden of proof. The similarity between foreign and domestic legal systems, suggests that the operational implications of foreign legislation will also be relevant to South Africa. This raises the debate as to the nature of fairness in the compensation context, the debate of comparable worth and the use of multiple regression analysis. The organisation must present to the court evidence to show that the choice of compensable constructs, their measurement and application does not discrimination directly or indirectly based on group membership. Multiple regression analysis, a statistical method to model the compensation system, is fraught with difficulties and misunderstanding. It is nevertheless the most appropriate method to investigate compensation fairness. Comparable worth and multiple regression analysis require assessment in the South African context. The issues, which hindered the successful use of multiple regression analysis abroad, are reviewed in order to smooth its entry into South African litigation. A framework is presented based on literature and case law whereby all parties concerned can produce and evaluate such evidence AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die nuwe Anti-Diskrimineringswetgewing verlang van Suid-Afrikaanse organisasies om salarisstelsels te regverdig. Gedurende salarisdiskriminasielitigasie word bewys verlang om die bewyslas oor te dra. Die gelyksoortigheid van buitelandse en binnelandse regstelsels gee te kenne dat die operatiewe implikasies van buitelandse wetgewing relevant tot Suid-Afrika sal wees. Dit bevraagteken die aard van billikheid in die kompensasie konteks, die debat van vergelykbare waarde en die gebruik van veelvoudige regressieontleding. Die betrokke party moet bewys aan die hof toon om te bevestig dat die keuse van vergoedingskonstruksie, sowel as die meting en toepassing daarvan, nie onregverdig diskrimineer, ten opsigte van demografiese groepe me. Veelvoudige regressieontleding 'n statistiese metode wat gebriuk kan word om die salarissisteem voor te stel. Alhoewel dit vele onduidelikhede bevat, is dit steeds die mees toepaslike metode om salarisbillikheid te ondersoek. Vergelykbare waarde en meervoudige regressieontleding is in die Suid-Afrikaanse konteks geëvalueer. Die aspekte wat die sukses van die gebruik van meervoudige regressieontleding in ander lande verhinder het, is ondersoek en geëvalueer om die toekomstige toepassing daarvan in Suid-Afrika te vergemaklik. 'n Raamwerk gebaseer op literatuur en gevalle studies word voorgestel, waar al die betrokke partye sodanige bewys kan produseer en evalueer. Masters 2012-08-27T11:33:19Z 2012-08-27T11:33:19Z 2005-04 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/50238 en_ZA Stellenbosch University 193 p. application/pdf Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
spellingShingle Pay equity -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
Equal pay for equal work -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
Discrimination in employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
Burden of proof -- South Africa
Wages -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
Regression analysis
Dissertations -- Industrial psychology
Theses -- Industrial psychology
Howard, Ryan Michael
A clarification of the use of multiple regression analysis in meeting the burden of proof in compensation discrimination litigation
title A clarification of the use of multiple regression analysis in meeting the burden of proof in compensation discrimination litigation
title_full A clarification of the use of multiple regression analysis in meeting the burden of proof in compensation discrimination litigation
title_fullStr A clarification of the use of multiple regression analysis in meeting the burden of proof in compensation discrimination litigation
title_full_unstemmed A clarification of the use of multiple regression analysis in meeting the burden of proof in compensation discrimination litigation
title_short A clarification of the use of multiple regression analysis in meeting the burden of proof in compensation discrimination litigation
title_sort clarification of the use of multiple regression analysis in meeting the burden of proof in compensation discrimination litigation
topic Pay equity -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
Equal pay for equal work -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
Discrimination in employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
Burden of proof -- South Africa
Wages -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
Regression analysis
Dissertations -- Industrial psychology
Theses -- Industrial psychology
url http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/50238
work_keys_str_mv AT howardryanmichael aclarificationoftheuseofmultipleregressionanalysisinmeetingtheburdenofproofincompensationdiscriminationlitigation
AT howardryanmichael clarificationoftheuseofmultipleregressionanalysisinmeetingtheburdenofproofincompensationdiscriminationlitigation