Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

In/exclusion and (dis)ability : (de)constructions of Education White Paper 6 : special needs education

Thesis (MEd)--University of Stellenbosch, 2002.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Van Rooyen, Brenda
Other Authors: Newmark, Rona
Format: Thesis
Language:en_ZA
Published: Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University 2012
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867614119224410112
access_status_str Open Access
author Van Rooyen, Brenda
author2 Newmark, Rona
author_browse Newmark, Rona
Van Rooyen, Brenda
author_facet Newmark, Rona
Van Rooyen, Brenda
author_sort Van Rooyen, Brenda
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv Stellenbosch University
description Thesis (MEd)--University of Stellenbosch, 2002.
format Thesis
id oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/52887
institution Stellenbosch University (South Africa)
language en_ZA
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:46:58.390Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
publishDate 2012
publishDateRange 2012
publishDateSort 2012
publisher Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
publisherStr Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
record_format dspace
source_str SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
spelling oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/52887 In/exclusion and (dis)ability : (de)constructions of Education White Paper 6 : special needs education Van Rooyen, Brenda Newmark, Rona Le Grange, Lesley Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Education. Dept. of Educational Psychology. Special education -- South Africa Inclusive education -- South Africa Mainstreaming in education -- South Africa Special education -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Dissertations -- Education Theses -- Education Thesis (MEd)--University of Stellenbosch, 2002. ENGLISH ABSTRACT: White Paper 6: Special Needs Education, released in July 2001, is the response ofthe South African government's Department of Education to the inclusion movement. In this (re)search, I (de)construct this text to explore constitutions of (dis)ability and inlexclusion. I do so because I frame (de)construction as 'an aggressive, political mode of critical analysis that strips conventional and assumed truths down to their logically insubstantial bare bones' (Danforth & Rhodes, 1997: 358). I argue that it is necessary to (de)constructively read government policy that proposes a course or policy of action, particularly if, as poststructuralists state, language constitutes reality. In reading White Paper 6, I (de)construct the functionalist grand narrative as hegemonic: discourses constituted by and constituting this metanarrative, including the medical or special needs discourse, the charity discourse, the systems discourse, the business discourse and the pioneering discourse. The radical humanist grand narrative is also read as dominant, formed by and forming the rights discourse and social justice discourse. The social constructionist discourse, constituting and constituted by the intepretivist grand narrative, is (dejconstructed in White Paper 6 as not reflecting upon the social construction of disability itself, but on social constructions related to (dis)ability and inlexclusion. The objects, agents, action and binaries constituted by each of these discourses are also (de)constructed, as are the voices on the margins. The purpose of my (re)search is not to construct conclusions, but rather to (de)construct the polyphony of voices, truths and realities speaking into and out of White Paper 6. In so doing, the 'indecidability' (Silverman, 1989: 4) of the text is (de)constructed. With the indecidable (de)constructed, '... discourses can no longer dominate, judge, decide: between the positive and negative, the good and the bad, the true and the false' (Derrida, 1992: 86). (Dis)ability and inlexclusion tmths are troubled and the text is opened to different readings. AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Witskrif 6: Spesialebehoefteonderwys, wat in Julie 2001 beskikbaar gestel is, is die reaksie van die Suid-Afrikaanse regering se Departement van Onderwys op die insluitingsbeweging. In hierdie (onder)soek(e) (de)konstrueer ek genoemde teks om bepalinge van (on)vermoë en inluitsluiting te ondersoek. Ek doen dit omdat ek (de)konstruksie sien as ". .. an aggressive, political mode of critical analysis that strips conventional and assumed truths down to their logically insubstantial bare bones ... " (Danforth & Rhodes, 1997: 358). Myns insiens is dit nodig om regeringsbeleid wat 'n handelswyse ten opsigte van, of beleid vir optrede voorstel, (de)konstruktief te lees, veral indien dit is soos die poststrukturaliste voorstel, naamlik dat taal werklikheid is. Met die lees van Witskrif 6, het ek die funksionalistiese groot narratief as hegemonies geede)konstrueer: diskoerse wat deur hierdie metanarratief gevorm word en dit tegelyk ook vorm, met inbegrip van mediese of spesialebehoeftediskoers, die relaas van naasteliefde, die stelseldiskoers, die sakediskoers en die baanbrekersdiskoers. Die radikaal humanistiese groot narratief, wat die regtediskoers en die diskoers van maatskaplike geregtigheid vorm en daardeur gevorm word, word ook as dominant vertolk. Die diskoers van maatskaplike konstruktivisme, wat die interpretatiewe groot narratief vorm en daardeur gevorm word, word in Witskrif 6 geede)konstrueer, as sou dit nie op die sosiale konstruksie van (on)vermoë self sinspeel nie, maar op sosiale konstruksies wat met (on)vermoë en inluitsluiting verband hou. Die voorwerpe, agente, optrede en binêres wat deur elk van hierdie diskoerse gevorm is, sowel as die stemme op die kantlyn, word ook deur hierdie diskoerse ge(de)konstrueer. Die doel van my (onder)soek(e) is nie om uitsluitings te konstrueer nie, maar eerder om die polifonie van stemme, waarhede en realiteite wat vanuit Witskrif 6 tot ons spreek, maar ook inspraak daarin het, te (de)konstrueer. Deur dit te doen, word die "indecidability" (Silverman, 1989: 4) van die teks ge(de)konstrueer. Met die nie-besluitnemende" ... discourses can no longer dominate, judge, decide: between the positive and negative, the good and the bad, the true and the false" (Derrida, 1992: 86). (On)vermoë en die inluitsluiting van Vt'aafhede is problematies en die teks word oopgemaak vir verskillende interpretasies. Masters 2012-08-27T11:35:12Z 2012-08-27T11:35:12Z 2002-03 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/52887 en_ZA Stellenbosch University 154 p. application/pdf Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
spellingShingle Special education -- South Africa
Inclusive education -- South Africa
Mainstreaming in education -- South Africa
Special education -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
Dissertations -- Education
Theses -- Education
Van Rooyen, Brenda
In/exclusion and (dis)ability : (de)constructions of Education White Paper 6 : special needs education
title In/exclusion and (dis)ability : (de)constructions of Education White Paper 6 : special needs education
title_full In/exclusion and (dis)ability : (de)constructions of Education White Paper 6 : special needs education
title_fullStr In/exclusion and (dis)ability : (de)constructions of Education White Paper 6 : special needs education
title_full_unstemmed In/exclusion and (dis)ability : (de)constructions of Education White Paper 6 : special needs education
title_short In/exclusion and (dis)ability : (de)constructions of Education White Paper 6 : special needs education
title_sort in exclusion and dis ability de constructions of education white paper 6 special needs education
topic Special education -- South Africa
Inclusive education -- South Africa
Mainstreaming in education -- South Africa
Special education -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
Dissertations -- Education
Theses -- Education
url http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/52887
work_keys_str_mv AT vanrooyenbrenda inexclusionanddisabilitydeconstructionsofeducationwhitepaper6specialneedseducation