Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Compound phase formation at Au-Al interfaces

Thesis (M. Sc.) -- University of Stellenbosch, 1995.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: De Waal, Hendrik Schalk
Other Authors: Pretorius, R.
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University 2012
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613842136104960
access_status_str Open Access
author De Waal, Hendrik Schalk
author2 Pretorius, R.
author_browse De Waal, Hendrik Schalk
Pretorius, R.
author_facet Pretorius, R.
De Waal, Hendrik Schalk
author_sort De Waal, Hendrik Schalk
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv Stellenbosch University
description Thesis (M. Sc.) -- University of Stellenbosch, 1995.
format Thesis
id oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/54681
institution Stellenbosch University (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:42:33.557Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
publishDate 2012
publishDateRange 2012
publishDateSort 2012
publisher Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
publisherStr Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
record_format dspace
source_str SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
spelling oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/54681 Compound phase formation at Au-Al interfaces De Waal, Hendrik Schalk Pretorius, R. Lombaard, J. C. Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Science. Dept. of Physics. Solid state physics Surfaces (Physics) Gold -- Surfaces Aluminum -- Surfaces Interfaces (Physical sciences) Dissertations -- Physics Thesis (M. Sc.) -- University of Stellenbosch, 1995. In this investigation solid state phase formation at gold–aluminium interfaces was studied. From previous work certain questions had remained unanswered which included the following: • What is the first phase to form between Au and Al and in what manner does the Au₅Al₂ and the Au₂Al phases interact during the initial stages of phase formation? • The possible existence of a nucleation barrier to the formation of the AuAl₂ phase, leading to the skipping of this non-congruently melting phase during phase formation. • The formation of what at first looked like a new aluminium rich phase after the formation of Au₅Al₂. Thin-film bilayers of gold and aluminium, both between 500 and 3000 Å thick, were deposited onto a SiO₂-covered silicon substrate using an ultra high vacuum electron beam deposition system. These structures were then heated in a vacuum furnace and analysed using a variety of analytical techniques. These analytical techniques included Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry (RBS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) and optical microscopy. A nuclear microprobe was used to carry out micro-beam RBS and alpha-beam Particle Induced X-ray Emission (α-PIXE). It was found that in agreement with the Effective Heat of Formation (EHF) model, the Au₅Al₂ phase was the first phase to form. The EHF model predicts that thermodynamically there is little to choose between the formation of Au₂Al₃ and the Au₅Al₂ as first phases. This could therefore also explain why after the initial formation of Au₅Al₂ the two phases were found to mix and grow together non-uniformly. The introduction of oxygen as an impurity into the aluminium slowed down the reaction rate between the gold and the aluminium and seemed to promote the formation of Au₂Al₃ relative to Au₅Al₂. The kinetics of Au₅Al₂ phase formation was measured using an in-situ dynamic RBS technique. The activation energy was found to be 2.28 eV and the pre-exponential factor was 9.03 cm²/sec. An attempt was made to overcome the nucleation barrier to the formation of the congruently melting AuAl phase by annealing the samples for long periods of time (up to 9 days), at relatively low temperatures (40 to 80 °C). Results seemed to show that at lower temperatures the drop in atomic mobility had a larger effect on phase formation than the decrease in interfacial velocity. RBS showed what at first looked like a new aluminium rich phase, but further X-ray diffraction analysis provided no evidence that a new Au–Al phase was present in these samples. This investigation also showed that under many conditions the gold–aluminium systems tested were very prone to non-uniform growth and void formation. The void formation is visible by SEM as structures which develop on the surface of the sample. The growth of these microstructures was studied in both the SiO₂/Au/Al and the SiO₂/Au/Al configurations as a function of annealing time. A nuclear microprobe was used to do micro-beam RBS and α-PIXE analysis of the structure and composition of the voids. Masters 2012-08-27T11:36:40Z 2012-08-27T11:36:40Z 1995 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/54681 en Stellenbosch University 112 pages : ill. application/pdf Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
spellingShingle Solid state physics
Surfaces (Physics)
Gold -- Surfaces
Aluminum -- Surfaces
Interfaces (Physical sciences)
Dissertations -- Physics
De Waal, Hendrik Schalk
Compound phase formation at Au-Al interfaces
title Compound phase formation at Au-Al interfaces
title_full Compound phase formation at Au-Al interfaces
title_fullStr Compound phase formation at Au-Al interfaces
title_full_unstemmed Compound phase formation at Au-Al interfaces
title_short Compound phase formation at Au-Al interfaces
title_sort compound phase formation at au al interfaces
topic Solid state physics
Surfaces (Physics)
Gold -- Surfaces
Aluminum -- Surfaces
Interfaces (Physical sciences)
Dissertations -- Physics
url http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/54681
work_keys_str_mv AT dewaalhendrikschalk compoundphaseformationataualinterfaces