Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

An analysis of the intercalation of Mark 11:12-25 in light of narrative criticism and the oral aspect of Mark

Thesis (MTh)--Stellenbosch University, 2014.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ok, Il
Other Authors: Nel, Marius Johannes
Format: Thesis
Language:en_ZA
Published: Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University 2014
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613739396628480
access_status_str Open Access
author Ok, Il
author2 Nel, Marius Johannes
author_browse Nel, Marius Johannes
Ok, Il
author_facet Nel, Marius Johannes
Ok, Il
author_sort Ok, Il
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv Stellenbosch University
description Thesis (MTh)--Stellenbosch University, 2014.
format Thesis
id oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/86501
institution Stellenbosch University (South Africa)
language en_ZA
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:40:56.191Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
publisherStr Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
record_format dspace
source_str SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
spelling oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/86501 An analysis of the intercalation of Mark 11:12-25 in light of narrative criticism and the oral aspect of Mark Ok, Il Nel, Marius Johannes Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Theology. Dept. of Old and New Testament. Bible. Mark, XI, 12-25 -- Criticism, interpretation, etc. Jesus Christ -- Cleasing of the Temple Miracles -- Biblical teaching UCTD Dissertations -- Theology Theses -- Theology Dissertations -- Old and New Testament Theses -- Old and New Testament Thesis (MTh)--Stellenbosch University, 2014. ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Mark 11:12-25 has been identified as an intercalation or sandwich structure (A-B-A) by many scholars as consisting of three linked episodes: the cursing of the fig tree (11:12- 14), the cleaning of the temple (11:15-19), and the withered fig tree (11:20-25). Using the function of intercalation, Mark 11:12-25 is then interpreted symbolically as a prophecy of the destruction of the temple. This interpretation, however, the researcher argues, is implausible. To substantiate this claim, the research aims to interpret Mark 11:12-25 in the light of narrative criticism and the oral aspect of Mark. Chapter 2 lays the basic foundation for the current research. This includes a brief history of the study of Mark, the historical interpretation of Mark 11:12-25, a comparison between Matthew and Mark, and of studies concerned with intercalation. Various differing opinions of intercalation are given that complicate our understanding of its function. The main goal of chapter 3 is to examine Mark 11:12-25 according to three narrative elements, namely setting, characters and events. On the grounds that every scene in Mark 11 is connected naturally in the time and space setting, it will be argued that Mark did not arrange the two stories in Mark 11:12-25 as intercalation with a theological purpose. Although some argue that the two stories do not fit the character of Jesus, on the contrary, it will be argued that both stories strengthens the authority and power of Jesus as it is depicted in the Gospel of Mark. If Jesus teaching is considered (11:20-25), then the symbolic interpretation of the prophecy of the destruction of the temple cannot be sustained. Chapter 4 deals with the oral aspect of Mark. Mark’s community were in all likelihood not readers, but hearers. Dewey offers some characteristics of oral narratives, particularly their additive and aggregative structures and their participatory character. These, she argues, helps the reader to interpret the various aspects of Mark that have divided both scholars and literary critics of the Gospel. Therefore, the fig tree story and the temple story will be examined in the light of the oral aspect of Mark. The final chapter will offer a summary of each chapter and a synthesized conclusion. AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Om Markus 11:12-25 korrek te interpreteer is vir 'n lang tyd reeds ʼn debatteerbare saak. Die gedeelte word dikwels as 'n invoeging (A-B-A) geïdentifiseer wat uit drie verweefde episodes bestaan: die vloek van die vyeboom (11:12-14), die skoonmaak van die tempel (11:15-19), en die verdorde vyeboom (11:20-25). Deur klem te lê op die funksie van die invoeging, interpreteer baie geleerdes Markus 11:12-25 as 'n simboliese voorspelling van die vernietiging van die tempel. Hierdie interpretasie, argumenteer die navorser egter, is onhoudbaar. Om die stelling te staaf, poog die navorsing om Markus 11:12-25 in die lig van vertellingskritiek en die mondelinge aspek van Markus te lees. Hoofstuk 2 lê die basiese fondasie van die skripsie. Dit sluit ‘n kort geskiedenis in van die studie van Markus, die historiese interpretasie van Markus 11:12-25, ‘n vergelyking tussen Matteus en Markus, en 'n opsomming van studies gemoeid met invoegings. Die verskillende menings oor die funksie van invoegings, wat die verstaan van Markus 11:12- 25 bemoeilik sal ook bespreek word. Die hoofdoel van hoofstuk 3 is om Markus 11:12-25 te ondersoek volgens drie narratiewe elemente, naamlik die setting, die karakter en die gebeure daarin vervat. Op grond daarvan dat elke toneel in Markus 11 verbind is ten opsigte van tyd en ruimte word aangevoer word dat Markus nie die twee stories in Markus 11:12-25 as invoeging met 'n teologiese doel georden het nie. Alhoewel sommige argumenteer dat die twee stories nie by die karakter van Jesus pas nie, sal dit in teendeel aangevoer word naamlik dat beide stories die gesag en mag van Jesus, soos dit uitgebeeld word in die evangelie van Markus, versterk. Hoofstuk 4 handel oor die mondelinge dimensie van Markus. Markus se gemeenskap was in alle waarskynlikheid nie lesers nie, maar hoorders. In die verband bied Dewey 'n paar eienskappe van mondelinge vertelling aan, veral die toevoeging en kumulatiewe strukture en deelnemende karakter daarvan. Hierdie, betoog sy, help die leser om die verskillende aspekte van Markus wat kritici van die Evangelie verdeel, te interpreteer. Die laaste hoofstuk bestaan uit ‘n opsomming van elke hoofstuk en ‘n gesintetiseerde gevolgtrekking. 2014-04-16T17:29:43Z 2014-04-16T17:29:43Z 2014-04 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/86501 en_ZA Stellenbosch University viii, 90 pages : illustration application/pdf Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
spellingShingle Bible. Mark, XI, 12-25 -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
Jesus Christ -- Cleasing of the Temple
Miracles -- Biblical teaching
UCTD
Dissertations -- Theology
Theses -- Theology
Dissertations -- Old and New Testament
Theses -- Old and New Testament
Ok, Il
An analysis of the intercalation of Mark 11:12-25 in light of narrative criticism and the oral aspect of Mark
title An analysis of the intercalation of Mark 11:12-25 in light of narrative criticism and the oral aspect of Mark
title_full An analysis of the intercalation of Mark 11:12-25 in light of narrative criticism and the oral aspect of Mark
title_fullStr An analysis of the intercalation of Mark 11:12-25 in light of narrative criticism and the oral aspect of Mark
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of the intercalation of Mark 11:12-25 in light of narrative criticism and the oral aspect of Mark
title_short An analysis of the intercalation of Mark 11:12-25 in light of narrative criticism and the oral aspect of Mark
title_sort analysis of the intercalation of mark 11 12 25 in light of narrative criticism and the oral aspect of mark
topic Bible. Mark, XI, 12-25 -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
Jesus Christ -- Cleasing of the Temple
Miracles -- Biblical teaching
UCTD
Dissertations -- Theology
Theses -- Theology
Dissertations -- Old and New Testament
Theses -- Old and New Testament
url http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/86501
work_keys_str_mv AT okil ananalysisoftheintercalationofmark111225inlightofnarrativecriticismandtheoralaspectofmark
AT okil analysisoftheintercalationofmark111225inlightofnarrativecriticismandtheoralaspectofmark