Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Revelation as divine testimony : a philosophical-theological inquiry

Thesis (DTh)--Stellenbosch University, 2014.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wahlberg, Mats Anders
Other Authors: Smit, D. J.
Format: Thesis
Language:en_ZA
Published: Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University 2014
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613764151410688
access_status_str Open Access
author Wahlberg, Mats Anders
author2 Smit, D. J.
author_browse Smit, D. J.
Wahlberg, Mats Anders
author_facet Smit, D. J.
Wahlberg, Mats Anders
author_sort Wahlberg, Mats Anders
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv Stellenbosch University
description Thesis (DTh)--Stellenbosch University, 2014.
format Thesis
id oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/86754
institution Stellenbosch University (South Africa)
language en_ZA
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:41:19.685Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
publisherStr Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
record_format dspace
source_str SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
spelling oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/86754 Revelation as divine testimony : a philosophical-theological inquiry Wahlberg, Mats Anders Smit, D. J. Brand, Gerrit V. W. Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Theology. Department of Systematic Theology and Ecclesiology. Revelation -- Christianity Witness bearing (Christianity) Knowledge, Theory of (Reliigion) Thesis (DTh)--Stellenbosch University, 2014. ENGLISH ABSTRACT: The dissertation examines, on the basis of insights from contemporary analytic philosophy of testimony, the intellectual viability of the traditional Christian conception of revelation as divine testimony. This conception entails that God reveals by speaking, and that people can acquire knowledge of God and divine things by believing what God says. In academic theology of recent decades, this view is often dismissed – under the label of “propositional revelation” – as authoritarian and intellectually problematic. Recent developments within the analytic philosophy of testimony, however, provide grounds for a re-evaluation. The dissertation has two purposes. One is to clarify the concept of propositional revelation and to examine what the consequences are, for Christian theology, of rejecting this idea. The second purpose is to investigate whether there is a way of explicating the divine testimonymodel of revelation (traditionally the most prominent version of propositional revelation) so as to render it intellectually credible today. Chapter 1 introduces the topic and describes the dissertation’s purposes, methods and sources. Chapters 2 and 3 address the first purpose by distinguishing, following Nicholas Wolterstorff, between manifestational and propositional conceptions of revelation, and by arguing that unless theologians posit some form of propositional revelation (e.g. revelation as divine testimony), theology will be threatened by incoherence. On the basis of a survey of a number of manifestational theories of revelation, selected from different categories in Avery Dulles’s classificatory scheme, the author argues that manifestational theories in general suffer from certain systematic limitations and therefore provide an insufficient basis for theology. This means that theologians have strong reason to take a second look at the idea of revelation as divine testimony. To evaluate this model is the second and main purpose of the dissertation, and it is addressed by the method of hypothesis construction and testing. In the present context, this means to construct a version of the divine testimony-model with the help of the best philosophical and theological tools available, and to examine whether internal coherence and coherence with established knowledge can be achieved. In chapters 4 and 5, the author describes the philosophical tools that will be used, viz. Nicholas Wolterstorff’s analysis of the idea of divine speech, and insights from recent analytic philosophy of testimony, especially John McDowell’s anti-reductionist theory of testimonial knowledge. In chapters 6-8, the divine testimony-model is elaborated using these tools and tested for internal coherence, coherence with external knowledge such as contemporary biblical scholarship, and coherence with traditional views of the nature of Christian faith. The model’s ability to withstand philosophical objections of various kinds is also scrutinized. The tentative conclusion of the dissertation is that the model is intellectually viable in light of current knowledge, but that further testing in the context of a wider scholarly debate is needed. Doctoral 2014-04-16T17:33:15Z 2017-02-01T03:00:05Z 2014-04 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/86754 en_ZA Stellenbosch University application/pdf application/pdf Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
spellingShingle Revelation -- Christianity
Witness bearing (Christianity)
Knowledge, Theory of (Reliigion)
Wahlberg, Mats Anders
Revelation as divine testimony : a philosophical-theological inquiry
title Revelation as divine testimony : a philosophical-theological inquiry
title_full Revelation as divine testimony : a philosophical-theological inquiry
title_fullStr Revelation as divine testimony : a philosophical-theological inquiry
title_full_unstemmed Revelation as divine testimony : a philosophical-theological inquiry
title_short Revelation as divine testimony : a philosophical-theological inquiry
title_sort revelation as divine testimony a philosophical theological inquiry
topic Revelation -- Christianity
Witness bearing (Christianity)
Knowledge, Theory of (Reliigion)
url http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/86754
work_keys_str_mv AT wahlbergmatsanders revelationasdivinetestimonyaphilosophicaltheologicalinquiry