Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Loose, fragmented project arrangements – Some implications for practitioners

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Project Management Research and Practice
Format: Online Article RSS Article
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1864030187405967361
collection WordPress RSS
FRELIP Feed Integration
container_title Project Management Research and Practice
description
discipline_display Social Sciences
discipline_facet Social Sciences
format Online Article
RSS Article
genre Journal Article
id rss_article:14601
institution FRELIP
journal_source_facet Project Management Research and Practice
publishDate 2019
publishDateSort 2019
record_format rss_article
spellingShingle Loose, fragmented project arrangements – Some implications for practitioners
— — — — — Management
Sociology
Social Sciences
sub_discipline_display Sociology
sub_discipline_facet Sociology
subject_display — — — — — Management
Sociology
Social Sciences
— — — — — Management
Sociology
Social Sciences
subject_facet — — — — — Management
Sociology
Social Sciences
title Loose, fragmented project arrangements – Some implications for practitioners
title_auth Loose, fragmented project arrangements – Some implications for practitioners
title_full Loose, fragmented project arrangements – Some implications for practitioners
title_fullStr Loose, fragmented project arrangements – Some implications for practitioners
title_full_unstemmed Loose, fragmented project arrangements – Some implications for practitioners
title_short Loose, fragmented project arrangements – Some implications for practitioners
title_sort loose, fragmented project arrangements – some implications for practitioners
topic — — — — — Management
Sociology
Social Sciences
url https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/PMRP/article/view/5466