Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Procedural Gamesmanship: How the IRS Avoids Merits Review in CDP and Deficiency Litigation

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fordham Urban Law Journal
Format: Online Article RSS Article
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1864030192633118724
collection WordPress RSS
FRELIP Feed Integration
container_title Fordham Urban Law Journal
description
discipline_display Law & Legal Studies
discipline_facet Law & Legal Studies
format Online Article
RSS Article
genre Journal Article
id rss_article:36629
institution FRELIP
journal_source_facet Fordham Urban Law Journal
publishDate 2026
publishDateSort 2026
record_format rss_article
spellingShingle Procedural Gamesmanship: How the IRS Avoids Merits Review in CDP and Deficiency Litigation
— — — — — — Civil Law
Civil Law
Law & Legal Studies
sub_discipline_display Civil Law
sub_discipline_facet Civil Law
subject_display — — — — — — Civil Law
Civil Law
Law & Legal Studies
— — — — — — Civil Law
Civil Law
Law & Legal Studies
subject_facet — — — — — — Civil Law
Civil Law
Law & Legal Studies
title Procedural Gamesmanship: How the IRS Avoids Merits Review in CDP and Deficiency Litigation
title_auth Procedural Gamesmanship: How the IRS Avoids Merits Review in CDP and Deficiency Litigation
title_full Procedural Gamesmanship: How the IRS Avoids Merits Review in CDP and Deficiency Litigation
title_fullStr Procedural Gamesmanship: How the IRS Avoids Merits Review in CDP and Deficiency Litigation
title_full_unstemmed Procedural Gamesmanship: How the IRS Avoids Merits Review in CDP and Deficiency Litigation
title_short Procedural Gamesmanship: How the IRS Avoids Merits Review in CDP and Deficiency Litigation
title_sort procedural gamesmanship: how the irs avoids merits review in cdp and deficiency litigation
topic — — — — — — Civil Law
Civil Law
Law & Legal Studies
url https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol53/iss4/5