Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation Framework

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Format: Online Article RSS Article
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1864030192373071876
collection WordPress RSS
FRELIP Feed Integration
container_title Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
description
discipline_display Arts & Humanities
discipline_facet Arts & Humanities
format Online Article
RSS Article
genre Journal Article
id rss_article:44965
institution FRELIP
journal_source_facet Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
publishDate 2026
publishDateSort 2026
record_format rss_article
spellingShingle Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation Framework
— — — — — Linguistics and Philology
Language & Literature
Arts & Humanities
sub_discipline_display Language & Literature
sub_discipline_facet Language & Literature
subject_display — — — — — Linguistics and Philology
Language & Literature
Arts & Humanities
— — — — — Linguistics and Philology
Language & Literature
Arts & Humanities
subject_facet — — — — — Linguistics and Philology
Language & Literature
Arts & Humanities
title Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation Framework
title_auth Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation Framework
title_full Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation Framework
title_fullStr Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation Framework
title_full_unstemmed Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation Framework
title_short Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation Framework
title_sort automatic reviewers fail to detect faulty reasoning in research papers: a new counterfactual evaluation framework
topic — — — — — Linguistics and Philology
Language & Literature
Arts & Humanities
url https://direct.mit.edu/tacl/article/doi/10.1162/TACl.a.642/136338/Automatic-Reviewers-Fail-to-Detect-Faulty