Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI
Saved in:
| Published in: | ArXiv cs.DL Recent Papers |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online Article RSS Article |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items: Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI
- Opening Pandora's box: Paper mills in conference proceedings
- LLM hallucinations in the wild: Large-scale evidence from non-existent citations
- Comparison of OpenAlex and Scopus coverage of German institutions' publications in top-tier journals
- ARA: Agentic Reproducibility Assessment For Scalable Support Of Scientific Peer-Review
- PlotPick: AI-powered batch extraction of numerical data from scientific figures
- Are Digital Humanities really committed to open? An exploratory study on the availability of methodological workflows and open peer review practices