Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

A global south strategy for evaluating research value with ChatGPT

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quantitative Science Studies
Format: Online Article RSS Article
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867301677321682946
collection WordPress RSS
FRELIP Feed Integration
container_title Quantitative Science Studies
description
discipline_display Library and Information Science2
discipline_facet Library and Information Science2
format Online Article
RSS Article
genre Journal Article
id rss_article:64917
institution FRELIP
journal_source_facet Quantitative Science Studies
publishDate 2026
publishDateSort 2026
record_format rss_article
spellingShingle A global south strategy for evaluating research value with ChatGPT
Library and Information Science2
General
Library and Information Science2
sub_discipline_display General
sub_discipline_facet General
subject_display Library and Information Science2
General
Library and Information Science2
Library and Information Science2
General
Library and Information Science2
subject_facet Library and Information Science2
General
Library and Information Science2
title A global south strategy for evaluating research value with ChatGPT
title_auth A global south strategy for evaluating research value with ChatGPT
title_full A global south strategy for evaluating research value with ChatGPT
title_fullStr A global south strategy for evaluating research value with ChatGPT
title_full_unstemmed A global south strategy for evaluating research value with ChatGPT
title_short A global south strategy for evaluating research value with ChatGPT
title_sort a global south strategy for evaluating research value with chatgpt
topic Library and Information Science2
General
Library and Information Science2
url https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/doi/10.1162/QSS.a.460/135425/A-global-south-strategy-for-evaluating-research