Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
A Cost-Benefit Interpretation of the "Substantially Similar" Hurdle in the Congressional Review Act: Can OSHA Ever Utter the E-Word (Ergonomics) Again?
Saved in:
| Published in: | Administrative Law Review |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online Article RSS Article |
| Published: |
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1868552875232198657 |
|---|---|
| collection | WordPress RSS FRELIP Feed Integration |
| container_title | Administrative Law Review |
| description | |
| discipline_display | Law |
| discipline_facet | Law |
| format | Online Article RSS Article |
| genre | Journal Article |
| id | rss_article:65057 |
| institution | FRELIP |
| journal_source_facet | Administrative Law Review |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-20T21:27:56.560Z |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| record_format | rss_article |
| spellingShingle | A Cost-Benefit Interpretation of the "Substantially Similar" Hurdle in the Congressional Review Act: Can OSHA Ever Utter the E-Word (Ergonomics) Again? Law General Law |
| sub_discipline_display | General |
| sub_discipline_facet | General |
| subject_display | Law General Law |
| subject_facet | Law General Law |
| title | A Cost-Benefit Interpretation of the "Substantially Similar" Hurdle in the Congressional Review Act: Can OSHA Ever Utter the E-Word (Ergonomics) Again? |
| title_alt | Una interpretación de costo-beneficio del obstáculo de "sustancialmente similar" en la Ley de Revisión del Congreso: ¿Puede OSHA pronunciar alguna vez la palabra E (Ergonomía) nuevamente? Une interprétation coût-bénéfice de l'obstacle de la « similarité substantielle » dans le Congressional Review Act : l'OSHA peut-elle jamais prononcer le mot E (ergonomie) à nouveau ? Uma Interpretação de Custo-Benefício do Obstáculo "Substancialmente Similar" na Lei de Revisão do Congresso: Pode a OSHA Alguma Vez Pronunciar a Palavra E (Ergonomia) Novamente? |
| title_auth | A Cost-Benefit Interpretation of the "Substantially Similar" Hurdle in the Congressional Review Act: Can OSHA Ever Utter the E-Word (Ergonomics) Again? |
| title_es_txt | Una interpretación de costo-beneficio del obstáculo de "sustancialmente similar" en la Ley de Revisión del Congreso: ¿Puede OSHA pronunciar alguna vez la palabra E (Ergonomía) nuevamente? |
| title_fr_txt | Une interprétation coût-bénéfice de l'obstacle de la « similarité substantielle » dans le Congressional Review Act : l'OSHA peut-elle jamais prononcer le mot E (ergonomie) à nouveau ? |
| title_full | A Cost-Benefit Interpretation of the "Substantially Similar" Hurdle in the Congressional Review Act: Can OSHA Ever Utter the E-Word (Ergonomics) Again? |
| title_fullStr | A Cost-Benefit Interpretation of the "Substantially Similar" Hurdle in the Congressional Review Act: Can OSHA Ever Utter the E-Word (Ergonomics) Again? |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Cost-Benefit Interpretation of the "Substantially Similar" Hurdle in the Congressional Review Act: Can OSHA Ever Utter the E-Word (Ergonomics) Again? |
| title_pt_txt | Uma Interpretação de Custo-Benefício do Obstáculo "Substancialmente Similar" na Lei de Revisão do Congresso: Pode a OSHA Alguma Vez Pronunciar a Palavra E (Ergonomia) Novamente? |
| title_short | A Cost-Benefit Interpretation of the "Substantially Similar" Hurdle in the Congressional Review Act: Can OSHA Ever Utter the E-Word (Ergonomics) Again? |
| title_sort | a cost-benefit interpretation of the "substantially similar" hurdle in the congressional review act: can osha ever utter the e-word (ergonomics) again? |
| topic | Law General Law |
| url | https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/alr/vol63/iss4/2 |