Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Revisiting Eli Lilly v. Canada: Judicial Interpretation of IP Law and Exposure to Investor-State Disputes

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Duke Law & Technology Review
Format: Online Article RSS Article
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867301675059904512
collection WordPress RSS
FRELIP Feed Integration
container_title Duke Law & Technology Review
description
discipline_display Law
discipline_facet Law
format Online Article
RSS Article
genre Journal Article
id rss_article:65376
institution FRELIP
journal_source_facet Duke Law & Technology Review
publishDate 2026
publishDateSort 2026
record_format rss_article
spellingShingle Revisiting Eli Lilly v. Canada: Judicial Interpretation of IP Law and Exposure to Investor-State Disputes
Law
General
Law
sub_discipline_display General
sub_discipline_facet General
subject_display Law
General
Law
Law
General
Law
subject_facet Law
General
Law
title Revisiting Eli Lilly v. Canada: Judicial Interpretation of IP Law and Exposure to Investor-State Disputes
title_auth Revisiting Eli Lilly v. Canada: Judicial Interpretation of IP Law and Exposure to Investor-State Disputes
title_full Revisiting Eli Lilly v. Canada: Judicial Interpretation of IP Law and Exposure to Investor-State Disputes
title_fullStr Revisiting Eli Lilly v. Canada: Judicial Interpretation of IP Law and Exposure to Investor-State Disputes
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting Eli Lilly v. Canada: Judicial Interpretation of IP Law and Exposure to Investor-State Disputes
title_short Revisiting Eli Lilly v. Canada: Judicial Interpretation of IP Law and Exposure to Investor-State Disputes
title_sort revisiting eli lilly v. canada: judicial interpretation of ip law and exposure to investor-state disputes
topic Law
General
Law
url https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dltr/vol26/iss1/1