Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

How can critical and feminist scholars respond to the decision in 'For Women Scotland'?

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:feminists@law
Format: Online Article RSS Article
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867301673131573249
collection WordPress RSS
FRELIP Feed Integration
container_title feminists@law
description
discipline_display Law
discipline_facet Law
format Online Article
RSS Article
genre Journal Article
id rss_article:65421
institution FRELIP
journal_source_facet feminists@law
publishDate 2025
publishDateSort 2025
record_format rss_article
spellingShingle How can critical and feminist scholars respond to the decision in 'For Women Scotland'?
Law
General
Law
sub_discipline_display General
sub_discipline_facet General
subject_display Law
General
Law
Law
General
Law
subject_facet Law
General
Law
title How can critical and feminist scholars respond to the decision in 'For Women Scotland'?
title_auth How can critical and feminist scholars respond to the decision in 'For Women Scotland'?
title_full How can critical and feminist scholars respond to the decision in 'For Women Scotland'?
title_fullStr How can critical and feminist scholars respond to the decision in 'For Women Scotland'?
title_full_unstemmed How can critical and feminist scholars respond to the decision in 'For Women Scotland'?
title_short How can critical and feminist scholars respond to the decision in 'For Women Scotland'?
title_sort how can critical and feminist scholars respond to the decision in 'for women scotland'?
topic Law
General
Law
url https://journals.kent.ac.uk/index.php/feministsatlaw/article/view/1422