Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The repercussions of a bad decision: How the 'For Women' judgment is in fact, for men

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:feminists@law
Format: Online Article RSS Article
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867301675010621444
collection WordPress RSS
FRELIP Feed Integration
container_title feminists@law
description
discipline_display Law
discipline_facet Law
format Online Article
RSS Article
genre Journal Article
id rss_article:65431
institution FRELIP
journal_source_facet feminists@law
publishDate 2026
publishDateSort 2026
record_format rss_article
spellingShingle The repercussions of a bad decision: How the 'For Women' judgment is in fact, for men
Law
General
Law
sub_discipline_display General
sub_discipline_facet General
subject_display Law
General
Law
Law
General
Law
subject_facet Law
General
Law
title The repercussions of a bad decision: How the 'For Women' judgment is in fact, for men
title_auth The repercussions of a bad decision: How the 'For Women' judgment is in fact, for men
title_full The repercussions of a bad decision: How the 'For Women' judgment is in fact, for men
title_fullStr The repercussions of a bad decision: How the 'For Women' judgment is in fact, for men
title_full_unstemmed The repercussions of a bad decision: How the 'For Women' judgment is in fact, for men
title_short The repercussions of a bad decision: How the 'For Women' judgment is in fact, for men
title_sort the repercussions of a bad decision: how the 'for women' judgment is in fact, for men
topic Law
General
Law
url https://journals.kent.ac.uk/index.php/feministsatlaw/article/view/1459