Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
This study explores Japan's reluctance to accept labor immigrants in the post-World War II era through the analytical lenses of identity politics and historical institutionalism. It examines how Japan’s national identity, emphasizing ethnic homogeneity and cultural preservation, has shaped restricti...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
AUC Knowledge Fountain
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This study explores Japan's reluctance to accept labor immigrants in the post-World War II era through the analytical lenses of identity politics and historical institutionalism. It examines how Japan’s national identity, emphasizing ethnic homogeneity and cultural preservation, has shaped restrictive immigration policies despite its economic need. Historical institutionalism provides a framework for understanding the persistence of these policies, which are rooted in the institutional legacies of Japan's post-war reconstruction. The research investigates the interplay between identity-based motivations and the institutional structures that constrain policy changes, highlighting how these dynamics have led to the exclusion of foreign labor despite the country’s demographic challenges. By analyzing the role of immigration laws, labor market access, and social security regulations, the study offers insights into the broader socio-political context influencing Japan’s immigration policy, contributing to a deeper understanding of how historical and cultural factors continue to shape contemporary political decisions.
The research contrasts Japan's approach with the immigration policies of Germany and France, where labor shortages after the war led to more open and structured immigration systems. In Germany and France, the need for a workforce and the evolving identities of immigrant populations were central to developing their immigration frameworks. In Japan, however, immigration laws, labor market access, and social security regulations have been guided by different priorities, deeply intertwined with national identity and institutional constraints. This comparative analysis highlights how historical and cultural factors shape immigration policies, offering insights into the broader socio-political |
|---|