Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The effect of schema-based training on dispositional reasoning components : comparing frame-of-reference training and schema-feedback training

Prior research shows that accurate interviewers have higher ‘dispositional reasoning’, defined as the ability to understand the relationship between personality, behaviour and situations. Drawing on schema theory, the present study attempted to determine if dispositional reasoning could be developed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hall, Jonathan
Other Authors: De Kock, Francois
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Organisational Psychology 2015
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613232916594688
access_status_str Open Access
author Hall, Jonathan
author2 De Kock, Francois
author_browse De Kock, Francois
Hall, Jonathan
author_facet De Kock, Francois
Hall, Jonathan
author_sort Hall, Jonathan
collection Thesis
description Prior research shows that accurate interviewers have higher ‘dispositional reasoning’, defined as the ability to understand the relationship between personality, behaviour and situations. Drawing on schema theory, the present study attempted to determine if dispositional reasoning could be developed in students who participated in interview training. We used two different experiments to assess the relative effectiveness of two different training approaches to enhance the subcomponents of dispositional reasoning: trait induction, trait extrapolation and trait contextualisation. Our first experiment used traditional frame-ofreference (FOR) training in an attempt to develop dispositional reasoning. In a second experiment, we developed schema-feedback training, a novel approach to training dispositional reasoning that is based on the use of schema refinement through feedback. We found that neither approach had an effect on the participants’ dispositional reasoning component scores when compared to a ‘no-training’ comparison group. The low statistical power (due to a relatively small sample size) was a limitation in this study. Further research is necessary to determine the malleability of interviewers’ dispositional reasoning.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/13673
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:32:52.713Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2015
publishDateRange 2015
publishDateSort 2015
publisher Organisational Psychology
publisherStr Organisational Psychology
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/13673 The effect of schema-based training on dispositional reasoning components : comparing frame-of-reference training and schema-feedback training Hall, Jonathan De Kock, Francois Organisational Psychology Prior research shows that accurate interviewers have higher ‘dispositional reasoning’, defined as the ability to understand the relationship between personality, behaviour and situations. Drawing on schema theory, the present study attempted to determine if dispositional reasoning could be developed in students who participated in interview training. We used two different experiments to assess the relative effectiveness of two different training approaches to enhance the subcomponents of dispositional reasoning: trait induction, trait extrapolation and trait contextualisation. Our first experiment used traditional frame-ofreference (FOR) training in an attempt to develop dispositional reasoning. In a second experiment, we developed schema-feedback training, a novel approach to training dispositional reasoning that is based on the use of schema refinement through feedback. We found that neither approach had an effect on the participants’ dispositional reasoning component scores when compared to a ‘no-training’ comparison group. The low statistical power (due to a relatively small sample size) was a limitation in this study. Further research is necessary to determine the malleability of interviewers’ dispositional reasoning. 2015-08-10T06:42:23Z 2015-08-10T06:42:23Z 2015 Master Thesis Masters MA http://hdl.handle.net/11427/13673 eng application/pdf Organisational Psychology Faculty of Commerce University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Organisational Psychology
Hall, Jonathan
The effect of schema-based training on dispositional reasoning components : comparing frame-of-reference training and schema-feedback training
thesis_degree_str Master's
title The effect of schema-based training on dispositional reasoning components : comparing frame-of-reference training and schema-feedback training
title_full The effect of schema-based training on dispositional reasoning components : comparing frame-of-reference training and schema-feedback training
title_fullStr The effect of schema-based training on dispositional reasoning components : comparing frame-of-reference training and schema-feedback training
title_full_unstemmed The effect of schema-based training on dispositional reasoning components : comparing frame-of-reference training and schema-feedback training
title_short The effect of schema-based training on dispositional reasoning components : comparing frame-of-reference training and schema-feedback training
title_sort effect of schema based training on dispositional reasoning components comparing frame of reference training and schema feedback training
topic Organisational Psychology
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/13673
work_keys_str_mv AT halljonathan theeffectofschemabasedtrainingondispositionalreasoningcomponentscomparingframeofreferencetrainingandschemafeedbacktraining
AT halljonathan effectofschemabasedtrainingondispositionalreasoningcomponentscomparingframeofreferencetrainingandschemafeedbacktraining