Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Comparative analysis of precontractual liability in cases of failed negotiations
There are a number of circumstances in which parties, that enter into negotiations to conclude a contract, incur losses because the anticipated contract does not materialise. The parties could for example think that they concluded a contract, which is, however, void or an offeror sends together with...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Public Law
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items: Comparative analysis of precontractual liability in cases of failed negotiations
- The limits on limited liability: a comparative analysis of piercing the corporate veil in Swedish and South African law
- Legal aspects of the precontractual phase : a comparative perspective
- The use of presumptions in determining liability for passive participation in price-fixing cartels: a comparative study
- Liability for compulsory pilots an analysis of recent changes in South African statutory law
- Remedying abuses of limited liability in company groups
- Challenges of safeguarding national interest in negotiating private investment contracts in Africa: case study on Malawi