Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

An empirical evaluation of students' perceptions of the nature of science : a comparison between groups

In 1991 Evans and Schibeci used a modified Views of Science-Technology-Society (VOSTS) instrument to assess 434 Australian students' views on selected aspects of the Science-Technology-Society (STS) theme. In South Africa , Parker and Rochford (1995), and the writer Edwards et al. (1997) conducted a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Edwards, Nazeem
Other Authors: Rochford, Kevin
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: School of Education 2014
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613297558159360
access_status_str Open Access
author Edwards, Nazeem
author2 Rochford, Kevin
author_browse Edwards, Nazeem
Rochford, Kevin
author_facet Rochford, Kevin
Edwards, Nazeem
author_sort Edwards, Nazeem
collection Thesis
description In 1991 Evans and Schibeci used a modified Views of Science-Technology-Society (VOSTS) instrument to assess 434 Australian students' views on selected aspects of the Science-Technology-Society (STS) theme. In South Africa , Parker and Rochford (1995), and the writer Edwards et al. (1997) conducted and published further corroborative studies with more than 1400 students. Set in the context of the debate on the "traditional" and "contemporary" models of the nature of science (after Palmquist and Finley, 1997), this study measures, compares and interprets the response patterns of five convenient sample groups to 26 items on the modified VOSTS instrument. The three subscales measure students' perceptions of the definition of science, scientific method and how scientific knowledge changes. The reliability of the instrument was computed for Cape Town students using Cronbach's coefficient which yielded α = 0.78; and its content had been shown to be inherently valid at the time it was developed. A self-completion questionnaire was administered by the writer to four Cape Town student samples in 1995 during normal periods of instruction at two high schools, a technikon and a college of education. The samples comprised 320 year 10 high school science students, 340 year 12 high school science students, 108 electrical engineering students, and 55 first year college of education science students respectively. The 434 year 10 Australian students' (sample 5) responses were compared with the responses of their South African counterparts. In order to determine statistically significant differences between the response frequencies of the sample groups on the 26 items, the χ² - test statistic was used.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/9715
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:33:54.099Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher School of Education
publisherStr School of Education
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/9715 An empirical evaluation of students' perceptions of the nature of science : a comparison between groups Edwards, Nazeem Rochford, Kevin Education In 1991 Evans and Schibeci used a modified Views of Science-Technology-Society (VOSTS) instrument to assess 434 Australian students' views on selected aspects of the Science-Technology-Society (STS) theme. In South Africa , Parker and Rochford (1995), and the writer Edwards et al. (1997) conducted and published further corroborative studies with more than 1400 students. Set in the context of the debate on the "traditional" and "contemporary" models of the nature of science (after Palmquist and Finley, 1997), this study measures, compares and interprets the response patterns of five convenient sample groups to 26 items on the modified VOSTS instrument. The three subscales measure students' perceptions of the definition of science, scientific method and how scientific knowledge changes. The reliability of the instrument was computed for Cape Town students using Cronbach's coefficient which yielded α = 0.78; and its content had been shown to be inherently valid at the time it was developed. A self-completion questionnaire was administered by the writer to four Cape Town student samples in 1995 during normal periods of instruction at two high schools, a technikon and a college of education. The samples comprised 320 year 10 high school science students, 340 year 12 high school science students, 108 electrical engineering students, and 55 first year college of education science students respectively. The 434 year 10 Australian students' (sample 5) responses were compared with the responses of their South African counterparts. In order to determine statistically significant differences between the response frequencies of the sample groups on the 26 items, the χ² - test statistic was used. 2014-11-18T18:27:01Z 2014-11-18T18:27:01Z 1999 Master Thesis Masters MEd http://hdl.handle.net/11427/9715 eng application/pdf School of Education Faculty of Humanities University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Education
Edwards, Nazeem
An empirical evaluation of students' perceptions of the nature of science : a comparison between groups
thesis_degree_str Master's
title An empirical evaluation of students' perceptions of the nature of science : a comparison between groups
title_full An empirical evaluation of students' perceptions of the nature of science : a comparison between groups
title_fullStr An empirical evaluation of students' perceptions of the nature of science : a comparison between groups
title_full_unstemmed An empirical evaluation of students' perceptions of the nature of science : a comparison between groups
title_short An empirical evaluation of students' perceptions of the nature of science : a comparison between groups
title_sort empirical evaluation of students perceptions of the nature of science a comparison between groups
topic Education
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/9715
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardsnazeem anempiricalevaluationofstudentsperceptionsofthenatureofscienceacomparisonbetweengroups
AT edwardsnazeem empiricalevaluationofstudentsperceptionsofthenatureofscienceacomparisonbetweengroups