Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Separate versus integrated financial and sustainability reports : the effects of presentation format on the cognitive effort of investors

Thesis (PhD (Accounting Sciences))--University of Pretoria, 2025.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Venter, Elmar Retief
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2025
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613479996751872
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Venter, Elmar Retief
author_browse Venter, Elmar Retief
author_facet Venter, Elmar Retief
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2024 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Thesis (PhD (Accounting Sciences))--University of Pretoria, 2025.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/103510
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:36:48.836Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2025
publishDateRange 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/103510 Separate versus integrated financial and sustainability reports : the effects of presentation format on the cognitive effort of investors Venter, Elmar Retief denice.pretorius@up.ac.za Rupert, Tim Pretorius, Denice UCTD Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Cognitive effort Decision-making Eye-tracking experiment Information processing Integrated reporting Investors Presentation format Sustainability reporting Thesis (PhD (Accounting Sciences))--University of Pretoria, 2025. This study determines whether the three presentation format dimensions of Integrated Reporting (IR), namely placement, labelling, and linkage, reduce the cognitive effort required by non-professional investors in making investment decisions. IR is intended to simplify the process for investors who need to form a clear and integrated view of a firm’s value creation ability. People prefer to put in as little cognitive effort (in terms of time and attention) as possible. The time spent can be measured directly in minutes and seconds, but how much attention is paid cannot be observed directly. However, attention can be observed using eye-tracking technology. Therefore, using an independent 2 × 2 × 2 between-subjects eye-tracking experiment, this study investigates whether the IR strategies of presenting financial and climate-related information in one single report, labelling information as financially material, and linking information reduces the cognitive effort put in by non-professional investors. The evidence shows that all three format dimensions contribute to some extent to a reduction of the cognitive effort that investors must expend to make an investment decision. Placement is the main driver in decreasing the total amount of time that investors spend on reaching a decision. Labelling has a significant effect on reducing search effort and increasing visual attention to financially material information. Labelling is particularly relevant when financial and sustainability information are presented in separate reports or are not linked. The study contributes to the academic literature on presentation format in the context of sustainability information. The results may be of interest to standard setters such as the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) and the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), because they enhance understanding of how presentation format can aid investment decision-making. UCDP Grant Accounting PhD (Accounting Sciences) Unrestricted Faculty of Economic And Management Sciences SDG-04: Quality Education 2025-07-22T08:42:02Z 2025-07-22T08:42:02Z 2025-09 2025-04 Thesis * S2025 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/103510 https://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.29336918.v1 en © 2024 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Cognitive effort
Decision-making
Eye-tracking experiment
Information processing
Integrated reporting
Investors
Presentation format
Sustainability reporting
Separate versus integrated financial and sustainability reports : the effects of presentation format on the cognitive effort of investors
title Separate versus integrated financial and sustainability reports : the effects of presentation format on the cognitive effort of investors
title_full Separate versus integrated financial and sustainability reports : the effects of presentation format on the cognitive effort of investors
title_fullStr Separate versus integrated financial and sustainability reports : the effects of presentation format on the cognitive effort of investors
title_full_unstemmed Separate versus integrated financial and sustainability reports : the effects of presentation format on the cognitive effort of investors
title_short Separate versus integrated financial and sustainability reports : the effects of presentation format on the cognitive effort of investors
title_sort separate versus integrated financial and sustainability reports the effects of presentation format on the cognitive effort of investors
topic UCTD
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Cognitive effort
Decision-making
Eye-tracking experiment
Information processing
Integrated reporting
Investors
Presentation format
Sustainability reporting
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/103510
https://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.29336918.v1