Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Kundi is an intermediate moisture meat (IMM) product conventionally prepared from camel meat (CM). There is a dearth of information on the production as well as*the nutritional and eating qualities of kundi from other meat types. An experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design to evalu...
| Format: | Article |
|---|---|
| Published: |
2009-04
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| LEADER | 00000njm a2000000a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | oai:repository.ui.edu.ng:123456789/4722 | ||
| 042 | |a dc | ||
| 720 | |a Omojola, A. B. |e author | ||
| 720 | |a Kassim, O. R. |e author | ||
| 720 | |a Fakolade, P. O. |e author | ||
| 720 | |a Olusola, O. O. |e author | ||
| 260 | |c 2009-04 | ||
| 520 | |a Kundi is an intermediate moisture meat (IMM) product conventionally prepared from camel meat (CM). There is a dearth of information on the production as well as*the nutritional and eating qualities of kundi from other meat types. An experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design to evaluate yield, nutrient composition and sensory characteristic of kundi prepared from CM, beef and chevon. The protein content of fresh CM (22.58%) was higher (p < 0.05) than the values of 19.57 and 20.83% obtained for beef and chevon respectively. The result showed that fresh beef has at least (p < 0.05) drip loss value of (2.46%) as against 4.03 and 3.53% obtained for CM and chevon respectively. Cooking loss values were 19.30, 21.26 and 20.36% for beef, CM and chevon respectively. Beef gave the least shear force value (6.68 kg/cm3) as compared to 8.39 kg/cm3 for CM and 7.06 kg/cm3 for chevon. The product yield ranged from 33.61 to 38.93%. Kundi from each of the 3 meat types contained about three times the protein in their respective raw meat. The ash content increased from 1.50, 1.05 and 1.31% in raw beef, CM and chevon to 5.80, 4.37 and 4.40% in kundi from corresponding meat type. Kundi from chevon was rated highest (p < 0.05) for flavour juiciness and tenderness while beef kundi (BK) was rated highest (p < 0.05) for colour. Camel kundi (CK) was rated least by the panelist in virtually all parameters scored. . The possibility of producing Kundi from beef and chevon will increase the consumption of the product especially by majority of consumers with aversion to camel meat. | ||
| 024 | 8 | |a 1996-0816 | |
| 024 | 8 | |a African Journal of Food Science 3(1), pp. 22-25 | |
| 024 | 8 | |a ui_art_omojola_yield_2009 | |
| 024 | 8 | |a http://ir.library.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/4722 | |
| 653 | |a Kundi | ||
| 653 | |a Camel meat | ||
| 653 | |a Beef | ||
| 653 | |a Chevon | ||
| 653 | |a Organoleptic properties | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Yield and quality evaluation of kundi (an intermediate moisture meat) prepared from camel, beef, and chevon |